Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Neuroimmunology Reports ; 2 (no pagination), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2258488

ABSTRACT

Background: Our understanding of the spectrum of neurological manifestations associated with COVID-19 keeps evolving. Reports of life-threatening neurological complications, such as acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), are alarmingly growing in number. Case presentation: We report a 42 years old previously healthy man who presented with left visual loss and cognition deterioration, manifesting at least ten days after infection with SARS-CoV-2. Serological work-up for potential immunological markers (i.e., antibodies against aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein) were negative. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple bilateral and asymmetrical lesions in the brainstem, cortical, juxtacortical, and periventricular regions, with surrounding edema. Post-contrast sequences demonstrated punctate, ring, and open ring enhancement patterns. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy was initiated for the patient, and he was placed on rituximab. After one month, his clinical symptoms had resolved, and his cognitive function was normal. Conclusion(s): We conducted an extensive literature search, and COVID-19-associated ADEM cases reported thus far were identified and reviewed. ADEM often occurs in a post-infectious fashion;however, it is unclear how SARS-CoV-2 infection can trigger such rapidly progressive episodes of encephalopathy and demyelination. Nevertheless, considering the alarming number of cases of ADEM developing after SARS-CoV-2 infection, neurologists should consider this severe phenotype of COVID-19 neurological complication in mind, enabling prompt therapeutic interventions to be made.Copyright © 2022

2.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 46(5): 461-467, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2240644

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe cases of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis (EFE) post-recovery from or hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This prospective audit involved patients with suspected endophthalmitis referred to a tertiary eye care center over a one-year period. Comprehensive ocular examinations, laboratory studies, and imaging were performed. Confirmed cases of EFE with a recent history of COVID-19 hospitalization±intensive care unit admission were identified, documented, managed, followed up, and described. RESULTS: Seven eyes of six patients were reported; 5/6 were male, and the mean age was 55. The mean duration of hospitalization for COVID-19 was approximately 28 days (14-45); the mean time from discharge to onset of visual symptoms was 22 days (0-35). All patients had underlying conditions (5/6 hypertension; 3/6 diabetes mellitus; 2/6 asthma) and had received dexamethasone and remdesivir during their COVID-related hospitalization. All presented with decreased vision, and 4/6 complained of floaters. Baseline visual acuity ranged from light perception (LP) to counting fingers (CF). The fundus was not visible in 3 out of 7 eyes; the other 4 had "creamy-white fluffy lesions" at the posterior pole as well as significant vitritis. Vitreous taps were positive for Candida species in six and Aspergillus species in one eye. Anti-fungal treatment included intravenous amphotericin B followed by oral voriconazole and intravitreal amphotericin B. Three eyes underwent vitrectomy; the systemic health of two patients precluded surgery. One patient (with aspergillosis) died; the others were followed for 7-10 months - the final visual outcome improved from CF to 20/200-20/50 in 4 eyes and worsened (hand motion to LP) or did not change (LP), in two others. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmologists should maintain a high index of clinical suspicion for EFE in cases with visual symptoms and a history of recent COVID-19 hospitalization and/or systemic corticosteroid use - even without other well-known risk factors.


Subject(s)
Amphotericin B , COVID-19 , Endophthalmitis , Eye Infections, Fungal , Vitrectomy , Voriconazole , Eye Infections, Fungal/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Fungal/epidemiology , Eye Infections, Fungal/therapy , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Endophthalmitis/diagnosis , Endophthalmitis/epidemiology , Endophthalmitis/etiology , Humans , Hospitalization , Amphotericin B/therapeutic use , Voriconazole/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged
3.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 46(1): 72-82, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2122593

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review cases of acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) after COVID-19 vaccination and add a similar case to the literature. METHODS: A thorough PubMed search was conducted, and data from studies describing AMN after COVID-19 vaccination were extracted, tabulated, pooled, and reviewed. RESULTS: We present a case of AMN in a young woman 5 days after immunization with the BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) COVID-19 vaccine. Data from 21 cases were pooled and reviewed. The most frequent vaccines among the cases were recombinant ones (13/21), followed by mRNA-based (6/21) and inactivated vaccines (2/21). Only one patient (5%) was male. Seventeen over twenty-one (81%) were young women, ages 18-33. Most cases (14/21; 67%) reported recent/concurrent use of contraceptive medication. In 90% of cases (19/21), symptoms appeared within 8 days of vaccination. A confined wedge-/oval-shaped lesion morphology was more frequent than a diffuse, semilunar one. Resolution of symptoms took 4 to over 15 weeks. CONCLUSION: Attention should be paid to the history of vaccination and contraceptive use in patients with sudden-onset visual symptoms. Optical coherence tomography is integral to the detection of AMN-related abnormalities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , White Dot Syndromes , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Acute Disease , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccination/adverse effects
4.
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders ; 59, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2004357

ABSTRACT

Objective(s): Neurological complications of COVID-19 have raised serious concerns among the experts, and hence, many mechanisms have been proposed to explain it. We sought to collect evidence by investigating the possible effect of the virus on multiple sclerosis (MS) disease course, in COVID-19-contracted people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Material(s) and Method(s): This prospective-retrospective hybrid cohort study conducted from July 2020 until July 2021, compares the rates of probable disease progressions (PDP) and relapses between the pre- and post-COVID-19 periods of RRMS patients, using non-parametric tests, a matched binary logistic model offset by follow-up, Kaplan-Meier plots, and a cox regression model. Result(s): The PDP rate (0.06 vs 0.19, P = 0.04) and relapse rate (0.21 vs 0.30, P = 0.30) were both lower in the post-COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period. However, matched binary logistic model offset by follow-up failed to display a significant difference in odds of PDP (OR [95% confidence interval]: 0.41 [0.13, 1.34], P = 0.14) and relapse (OR [95% confidence interval]: 0.99 [0.45, 2.17], P = 0.99), at the endpoints of pre- and post-COVID-19 periods. Kaplan-Meier plots and cox regression model did not show significant difference between the pre- and post-COVID-19 periods, regarding both the PDP rates (HR [95% CI]: 0.46 [0.12, 1.73], P = 0.25) and relapse rates (HR [95% CI]: 0.69 [0.31, 1.53], P = 0.36). Conclusion(s): Our results suggest that COVID-19 contraction is unlikely to increase the risk of MS progression and relapse in the following months after infection.

5.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 178(1-2): 121-128, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1720667

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To gather, synthesize, and meta-analyze data regarding the risk factors associated with a severe course of COVID-19 among patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and WoS were searched in May 2021. Briefly, the eligibility criteria included: 1) studies assessing COVID-19 severity among adult pwMS; 2) definitive diagnoses or high clinical suspicion of COVID-19; 3) a categorization of COVID-19 severity into at least two categories; 4) quantitative effect size and precision measurements; and 5) English language; and 6) clear effect size/precision measures. internal validity of studies was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tools. A list of possible risk factors was created based on the search results and was later used in extraction, synthesis, and meta-analysis of the data. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the syntheses. Outcome measures were either extracted from the papers, obtained from the primary researchers or calculated manually. The meta-analyses showed a significantly (P<0.05) increased odds of a severe COVID-19 in pwMS with all of the assessed risk factors, except smoking and most DMTs. CONCLUSION: This study facilitates evidence-based risk/benefit assessments in practice. Older men with progressive MS on anti-CD20 therapies are more at risk of an unfortunate COVID-19 outcome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Sclerosis , Adult , Aged , Humans , Male , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnosis , Multiple Sclerosis/epidemiology , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
6.
New Microbes New Infect ; 41: 100874, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1164256

ABSTRACT

Diagnostic testing is important for managing the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). We developed an optimized protocol for SARS-CoV-2 RNA extraction from the surface of the respiratory mucosa with nasopharyngeal swabs and compared the sensitivity of RNA extraction methods. RNA extraction was performed using three different procedures (TRIzol, QIAamp, VMT-TRIzol) from nine positive SARS-CoV-2 samples. SARS-CoV-2 was detected by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) using a detection kit for SARS-CoV-2 (Sun Yat-sen University). Compared to RT-PCR results, there were no discernible differences in detection rates when comparing the three different extraction procedures. On the basis of these results, the use of TRIzol as a transport medium and RNA extraction method for SARS-CoV-2 detection may be a helpful alternative for laboratories facing shortages of commercial testing kits.

7.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 2020 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-843819

ABSTRACT

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the authors and editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL